keskiviikko 16. lokakuuta 2013

MOOC, myself and I – Growing my e-heels

T4 IDENTITY TASK


MOOC_poster_mathplourde.jpg (844×536)



MOOC what?” was my initial thought when I saw the four letter abbreviation for the first time – i.e. yesterday. This is how flat my e-heels are. My second thought was ”Oh boy!”. Similarly in the beginning of the T2 and T3 tasks a wave of overwhelming despair got my shoes wet. I realized, once again, how much I still have to learn in the world of online learning, teaching, creating learning environments, developing my online teacher identity. Not just vocabulary wise, but also content and context wise. I realize I have miles ahead of me. I choose to look at this from Appreciative Inquiry perspective (Cooperrider, D & Whitney, D., 2005) rather than concentrating on what I don't know; I will take this challenge as an opportunity to learn. I could at this point being overwhelmed and all choose to get rid of my inadequate e-shoes, but I choose to keep my shoes on. I think climbing an e-ladder may sometimes be easier with flats rather than high heels.

After searching information about MOOC online and reading The Pedagogy of MOOCs by Paul Stacey (2013) I have to say that MOOC isn't just great, it is a fantastic invention with enormous innovative possibilities in the global multicultural learning world of the 21st century. In a not so distant future I could see myself studying in a MOOC learning environment and in a tad more distant future I could imagine myself engaging in a multicultural collaborative manner in creating a MOOC learning environments and cultures. Even though I am by far not (yet) equipped to create any online learning modules in practice – I totally realize and accept the lack in my ICT-skills – that does not prevent me from creating future modules, online courses and learning environments in theory. I choose to keep my current shoes and courageously move forward even if it means I have to tiptoe at times in order to compensate the lack of e-heel height. I also think that T4 will add to my online identity in that I will gain a wider understanding of the different possibilities in EdTech and online learning and also deepen my knowledge and understanding of different learning pedagogies, esppecially when it comes to creating and designing multicultural online learning modules and environments.

I feel that M4 has added and therefore T4 will add to my teacher identity and definitely has helped and encouraged me to grow my e-heels. As for MOOC, cultural factors in online education design and quality check lists; I have not yet communicated with my peers. I am very anxiously waiting other T4 blog posts, reflections and comments so that I can gain more knowledge, information and insight on this topic. Since I am in the very beginning of the MOOC paths and in desigining online modules, I am very keen on hearing your experieces with MOOCs and online module design!? What kind of experiences do you have? How have you been able to utilize your MOOC knowledge and experience in your studies, your teaching, in creating online modules and in developing your teacher identity? Do share!




Cooperrider, D & Whitney, D. 2005. Appreciative Inquiry - A positive revolution in change.
Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc. San Francisco.


Stacey, Paul. 2013. Week 9: The Pedagogy of MOOCs. http://mooc.efquel.org/tag/the-pedagogy-of-moocs/


http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cb/MOOC_poster_mathplourde.jpg

keskiviikko 2. lokakuuta 2013

T3 TOPIC TASK Teaching through culture


Teaching through culture

- 8 Aboriginal ways of learning






After reading the online journal by Rutherford and Kerr (2008) I became fascinated by the Australian Aboriginal learning culture in the sense that I wanted to learn more. Though, I think part of the fascination has existed within me already before hand due to the time I spent in Australia during the change of the millennium. Also seeing the movie Australia five years ago activated my interest in the Australian Aboriginal culture. Hence on my international study journey I've decided to travel to Australia and learn more about the 8 Aboriginal ways of learning and also expand my knowledge of the Australian Aboriginal learning culture or cultures by using the Table 4 learning culture characteristics examination frame, in somewhat modified. I am particularly interested in the usage of narrative and symbols and images as teaching tools. Also I want to find out the relation of teacher centred vs. student centred teaching as well as behaviourist vs. constructivist learning concepts in Aboriginal learning cultures. I am also interested in finding out the possible differences and similarities when comparing Australian Aboriginal learning culture to the Finnish one. In my opinion it is important to value contents of both (and other) learning cultures. Observing other learning culture or cultures will be a fantastic experience for me and I am eager to see what contents from the Finnish learning cultures I might be able to bring into the Australian Aboriginal one and vice versa.

Henderson (1996, 2007) talks about the constructivist approach and affirms that ”while it is important to incorporating cultural diversity into the learning context, it is insufficient”. According to Henderson a multiple culture model should be used, where academic culture, the dominant culture and the minority culture or cultures should be integrated into the course design. I am interested in knowing how or if the constructivist learning concept and the minority cultures are taken into consideration and brought into the course designs in Australian Aboriginal learning environments and cultures.

”In a Western epistemology, from either a constructivist or instructivist perspective, each individual has the right to acquire knowledge. These contrasts with the Australian Aboriginal epistemology, where access to certain forms of knowledge to the younger generations who, excessively influenced by Western culture, are unlikely to act as guardians of that knowledge. Furthermore, in Aboriginal culture, the person who possesses knowledge does not own it, but is rather its guardian. This important distinction is manifested in behaviours that be misunderstood in the Western dominated academic world: the requirement to cite sources in academic work is not culturally grounded in Aboriginal culture (Henderson, 1996).”



In my vocational teacher studies in addition to the AI-method we have focusing on using a narrative as a teaching tool. Szurmak and Thuna (2013) talk about narrative as a powerful tool for teaching and learning.


Tell me a fact and I'll learn.
Tell me the truth and I'll believe.
But tell me a story and it will live in my heart forever. ”
-Indian Proverb-

(A footnote: In my opinion the proverb fits regardless the Indian origin - cultures come together)


According to Szurmak and Thuna ”the power of narrative lies in the fact that it harnesses the strategies the brain already uses for learning”. The duo sees the following elements of narrative in teaching as particularly resonant:
A. Narrative makes something abstract more concrete/immediate.

B. Narrative contextualizes information by creating the framework for students to place the new knowledge into (and thus improve their retention and understanding).

C. Narrative allows students to have more immediate emotional experiences that they can relate to (and therefore remember).


The use of narrative as a teaching tool is present in the Aboriginal pedagogy framework called 8 Aboriginal Ways of Learning (http://8ways.wikispaces.com/ ) with a term difference. In the 8 Aboriginal Ways of Learning narrative-driven learning is called Story Sharing. The other interconnected pedagogies in Aboriginal learning are Learning Maps, Non-verbal, Symbols and Images, Land Links, Non-linear, Deconstruct/Reconstruct and Community Links (See below).






Tell a story. Make a plan. Think and do. Draw it. Take it outside. Try a new way. Watch first, then do. Share it with others.






The carving on above picture are considered learning tools for exploring the 8 ways. ”Each object carries and inform deep knowledge about a way of learning” (http://8ways.wikispaces.com/ ). At this point I can't help but think whether such object can be found in Finland which could carry and inform knowledge in the same deep sense in the Finnish learning culture.

Description below for explanations of each element:

Story Sharing: Approaching learning through narrative.
Learning Maps: Explicitly mapping/visualising processes.
Non-verbal: Applying intra-personal and kinaesthetic skills to thinking and learning.
Symbols and Images: Using images and metaphors to understand concepts and content.
Land Links: Place-based learning, linking content to local land and place.
Non-linear: Producing innovations and understanding by thinking laterally or combining systems.
Deconstruct/Reconstruct: Modelling and scaffolding, working from wholes to parts (watch then do).
Community Links: Centring local viewpoints, applying learning for community benefit.


8 Aboriginal Ways of Learning fascinates and tickles me. I am so eager to learn more about this pedagogy framework and how it affects and is part of the Australian Aboriginal learning culture or cultures. On the webpages(http://8ways.wikispaces.com/)
it is stressed however that these 8 simple pedagogies are ”merely a starting point for dialogue and that each school engages in a different way” and ”produces its own unique frameworks for Aboriginal education through dialogue with the community about local ways of doing things”. I think it is safe to say there is no one Australian Aboriginal learning culture, but many. I'd be eager to find out to what extend even if somehow modified or if at all the 8 Aboriginal Ways of Learning are existing and taking place in Finnish learning cultures. Wouldn't you? What would be the 8 Finnish Ways of Learning?




On my international study journey I would be focusing on observing varied Aboriginal learning cultures by visiting several different schools and learning environments.


Observations
Similarities
Differences
Student and teacher activities
Ways of teaching (teaching methods & practices)


Teacher’s role


Student’s role


Relations between teachers and students


Relations between peers


Communication and collaboration in the school community


General atmosphere / climate
Learning context
Subjects taught


Timetables


Class size


Exams / evaluations / assessment


Order/discipline


Attitudes and values of student and teachers
Learning resources
Learning materials
The use of ICT
Student consultation
How is it organised?
Support given for students with learning difficulties
Attention given to talented students
Other observations
Low / high context learning





Teacher / Student centered learning

Constructivist learning concept

Individual / Collaborative learning processes

The use of the AI-method

The use of images and metaphors to understand concepts and content

The influence of Western culture

E-Learning environments


I think that with the help of the above learning culture characteristics examination frame with added perspectives combined with authentic observation experiences and face to face discussion and interviews I will be able to form a comprehensive understanding of the Australian Aboriginal learning cultures. I think learning both differences and similarities of different learning cultures is valuable and important and gives tools for further designing multicultural (e-)learning environments in the 21st century. I can't wait to fly Down Under!





References

Henderson, L. 1996. Instructional Design of Interactive Multimedia: A Cultural Critique. ETR&D, 44(4), 85-104

Henderson, L. 2007. Theorizing a multiple cultures instructional design model for e-learning and e-teaching. In A. Edmundson (Ed.) Globalized e-learning cultural challenges (pp.130-153). London: Information Science Publishing.





Rutherford, A. & Kerr, B. (2008). An Inclusive Approach to Online Learning Environments: Models and Resources. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 9(2), article 2. Retrieved 14.2.2013 fromhttp://tojde.anadolu.edu.tr/tojde30/pdf/article_2.pdf

Szurmak, J. And M. Thuna. 2103. Tell Me a Story: The Use of Narrative as a Tool



tiistai 1. lokakuuta 2013

T3 IDENTITY TASK

The difficulty of definition

What is culture? What is learning cultures? It is hard to define the concepts of culture and learning cultures. There really isn't one solid definition. Teräs & co. (2012) state that ”culture” is not easy to define and that ”Culture is a complex concept, and learning cultures are affected by many variables” Also according to Rutherford and Kerr (2008) when it comes to culture ”there are multiple definitions”.

Culture consists of patterns, explicit and implicit, of and for behavior, acquired and transmitted by symbols constituting the distinctive achievement of human groups, including their embodiment in artifacts; the essential core of culture consists of traditional (i.e., historically derived and selected) ideas and especially their attached values; culture sysmtems may, on the one hand, be considered as products of action, on the other as conditioning elements of furhter action” (Agar, 2002, p.115).

Culture … is that complex whole which includes knowledge, belief, art, law, morals, custom, and any other capabilities and habits aquired by man as a member of society.” (Tylor, 1924 [orig.1871]).

Rutherford and Kerr (2002) state that even though ”there are numerous definitions, they all refer to four fundamental properties of culture”: Culture is holistic, shared, transmittable and evolving. Street (1993) has referred to culture as being a ”verb”, not a ”noun” which clearly sees culture as dynamic - culture is constantly constructing itself.

Culture is communication and communication is culture” (Hall, 1990, p. 186)

Culture is something you create, a coherent connection of differences..”
(Agar, 2002, p. 127-128)

Quite honestly, I find the definition of culture difficult. I do comprehend the definitions above and crasp the idea of culture. I also share the understanding of culture as dynamic and constantly evolving. Still, I have to admit that if someone was to stop my shoes on a street and ask me what culture is, I don't know if I'd be able to give one straight answer.

Does anyone share this difficulty of definition?


Changes in learning cultures

Learning culture is defined as a set of shared beliefs, values and attitudes favourable to learning” (http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/innovative-workplaces_9789264095687-en)

I already wrote some of my thoughts and reflections about learning cultures on my previous blog post Recognizing, defining, developing, comparing cultures – possible, mandatory, voluntary?

Learning happens through social interaction. Learning happens everywhere, all the time, in all different ways. Learning processes, environments, participants create learning cultures. Learners gain something when learning but also bring bits of themselves into the learning process and the learning culture. Learning (I believe) is an active process. Learning cultures are formed, they develop, evolve, grow locally, globally, nationally, internationally, culturally, interculturally, multiculturally on land through human contact online through interactive contact. What is a learning culture really? There definitely is not one. What are learning cultures? Where are they?

On the 21st century online learning is the topic of the day and with that come learning cultures. The internet has brought the world to our finger tips – literally. Everyone has a chance to travel around the world, participate in multicultural interaction, be part of different learning cultures without actually leaving ones home. Does everyone really have that chance to be part of a leaning culture? Does one have a chance to alternate between different cultures or be part of different learning cultures simultaneously?”






Learning cultures in Finland have changed quite a bit over the decades. When my grandmother and mother went to school learning cultures were very teacher centered; behaviourist learning concept was present and learning was more of a subject based passive adoption throug individual learning process. Rules and discipline were strict and techers were ”on the podium”, often literally in the classrooms. Students were to sit quitely and learn by listening. Learning cultures were formed by teachers and other educational staff, students were not involved. Collaboration between teacher and students were nearly non-existent. Teachers had all the answers.

When I was in comprehensive school much of the behaviourist learning concept was still present. Though by highschool learning cultures started to change towards being more student centred with constructivist learning concept and collaborative learning processes. Teachers started to ”come down” from their platforms and interaction between teachers and students became more possible and accepted. Students were encouraged to take part in lessons and be active. Students were (and are nowadays) encouraged to learn by doing. Students started to become more involved in their school through student counsils and collaboration with teachers in forming learning environments and learning cultures became possible. Internet and computers started to bring their own flavor and possibilities to teaching, learning and learning cultures. Colour i.e. students from different nationalities and backgrounds in the classrooms were still rare.





Today we are living in the multicultural global diverse 21st century and learning cultures have had to adapt. At least in my experience they have. I think learning cultures today are often multicultural, flexible and diverse. There are different kinds of combined studies and special educational paths to choose from. Today learning cultures offer more possibilities and opportunties and take individual needs more into consideration. Constructivist learning concept, student involvement, active learning, learning by doing, online learning, collaboration, teamwork, individual consideration, interculturalism, multiculturalism, social interaction, innovation, reflection, assessment are part of today's learning cultures.

When talking about learning cultures one aspect I want to talk about (due to my past and current work experince) is the equal learning opportunity. In the past all students in the same class had the same curriculum. If you couldn't read or had other disabilities or learning problems or lack of language skills you would just ”fell of the ladder”. Today equal learning opportunity is stressed and offered. There are different kinds of support tools that are used to keep students on the ladder and help even the troubled ones up the learning ladder. I mean this is how it supposed be at least. In my opinion. What do you think?



Education online

The first time I touched a computer was in the early 90's in the IT lab in junior high school. The first time I surfed in the Internet was a couple of years later in high school. In the late 90's at the university I still searched information from books, but also started to get familiar with the amazing world of the Internet search. In the early 21st century in Polytechnic Internet search was in full bloom and Polytechnic already offered course information online, no actual online courses yet, though I was able to carry out a course online (email correspondence) from across the ocean before graduation in 2003. I attended a course at open university in 2006 and all of the course material was online, though the actual course was carried out by face to face lessons and pair work. I think this is when I first became aware of the existence of online education.






This module is the first actual online course I've taken so you could say I'm wearing my training shoes when it comes to learning online. For many years I've of course been aware of the education possibilities online. Through this module I've become more aware of the vast and varied possibilities of education online. ”Education technology and oline interaction tools are still new for a great part of teachers” (Teräs & co. 2012), myself included. Of course the vast development and distribution of technology and shared education has made the rapid and worldwide development of education online possible.
I think you could say online education has exploded i.e. Today there are thousands of course options to choose from in different schools, organizations, in different languages, different coutries. Nowadays, it's not the lack of supply in education rather it's the oversupply. Or is it?

Can't help but think that if computers, the Internet and online education was never developed and distributed worldwide this M4 module would have never taken place.
My shoe collection would have been so much poorer.


                                  fyi; pic only a metaphor; not my actual feet nor shoe collection ;)
                                     

Creating a learning culture

In his article How to Create a Positive Learning Culture Paul J. H. Schoemaker states that no one has all the answers which according to him is a good thing. I'm the first to admit to my students if I don't know something. I always encourage them to find answers (online or elsewhere). Schoemaker gives suggestions on how you should approach creating a better learning environment and thus in my opinion a positive learning culture. Even though Schoemaker is giving suggestions for creating a genuine learning culture at work I think these suggestions can well be applied to learning environments else where i.e. classrooms, online learning environments etc.

  1. Make learning a daily habit
  2. Don't be defensive – confront failings honestly
  3. Allow mistakes and celebrate them at times
(Schoemaker, 2012)

According to Schoemaker ”leaders [teachers as leaders in classrooms and virtual learning environments] should be the focal point as well as champions for learning” and see ”that mistakes become sources of new learning”. Schoemaker also sees ”mistakes as valuable sources of learning”. In my vocational teacher studies we are bringing a method from the business world called Appreciative Inquiry into teaching and creating positive learning environments and learning cultures. The main idea of the AI-method is that you focus on what could be instead of what could have been; in a learning environment you don't focus on what the student hasn't done or doesn't yet know, instead you focus on what the student already knows and can and build on that knowledge; you focus on what the student can be and could be instead of what (s)he can't.

This method spiced with positive feedback, looking at each student as an individual, offering students cultural experiences also outside the classroom and creating ”opportunities for meaningful interaction” (Kogin, 2011) by encouraging them in their studies towards collaboration and teamwork is the kind of learning culture I as a teacher want to create and promote.





I also strongly believe that ”supporting the development of learner's self-confidence is essential in a new type of learning environment” (Teräs & co. 2012) In my opinion an important method in promoting learner's self-confidence is AI-method positive feedback included.

Ap-pre’ci-ate, v., 1. valuing; the act of recognizing the best in people or the world around us; affirming past and present strengths, successes, and potentials; to perceive those things that give life (health, vitality, excellence) to living systems 2. to increase in value, e.g. the economy has appreciated in value. Synonyms: VALUING, PRIZING, ESTEEMING, and HONORING.In-quire’ (kwir), v., 1. the act of exploration and discovery. 2. To ask questions; to be open to seeing new potentials and possibilities. Synonyms: DISCOVERY, SEARCH, and SYSTEMATIC EXPLORATION, STUDY.


”Appreciative Inquiry is about the coevolutionary search for the best in people, their organizations, and the relevant world around them.”
(Cooperrider, D & D. Whitney, 2005)
I can easily transfer the above statement into learning cultures; Creating a positive learning culture is about concentrading on the best of students and the relevant worlds, cultures and learning cultures around them. Make sense?



Developing as a multicultural teacher

”Teacher identity is a useful research frame because it treats teachers as whole persons in and across social contexts who continually reconstruct their views of themselves in relation to others, workplace characteristics, professional purposes, and cultures of teaching. [Teacher identity} is also a pedagogical tool that can be used by teacher educators and professional development specialists to make visible various holistic, situated framings of teacher development in practise.”
                                                                                                                   (Brad Olsen, 2008)

I touched the identity task in my previous blog post:

In my teacher studies I am also reflecting my teacher identity; where was I before entering the study program, where am I now, where am I heading.. I am thinking about the same issues in this module but with the multicultural online twist. As a teacher I am all about offering equal learning opportunities for everyone regardless the background, possible economical or social limitations, nationality etc. As a multicultural online teacher I have just started to form and develop my identity but still I can say that core issues also in my multicultural online teacher identity is the possibility to offer equal learning opportunities for everyone. In order for that to be possible there is plenty for me to learn. Of course my multicultural online teacher identity is part of my teacher identity, I get it – now. Never before have I understood or really thought about how many layered my teacher identity is or can be. Recognizing, defining, developing, comparing learning cultures will definitely be a challenge for me but also will develop and expand my teacher identity.”

Like the 20 participants in Walton and Vykovic's (2003) study I am an Internet novice and education technology and online interaction tools are still quite new for me. This is mind I stated earlier having training shoes on. Well, no one has the training shoes nor wheels on forever. I believe in lifelong learning. I also believe that learning is about opportunity and attitude. I believe I can develop as a multicultural teacher by further learning about online learning environments, cultures and tools. I also think that - by familiarizing myself with, observing and learning about different, foreign, intercultural, multicultural school systems, learning environments and learning cultures (f.ex. with the help of Table 4 chart) and if possible take part in teacher trainee exchange in multicultural learning environments and cultures - I will develop as a multicultural teacher.







References

Agar, M. (2002) Understandinf the culture of conversation. New York: Perennial.

Hall, E.T. (1990) [orig. 1959] The Silent Language (4th edition). New York: Anchor Books.



Cooperrider, D & D. Whitney. 2005. Appreciative Inquiry - A positive revolution in change. Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc. San Francisco.
Kogin, N. 2011. Supporting Cultural Diversity in e-Learning. Uploaded 20.2.2011. Retrieved 19.7.2013

Olsen, B. 2008. Teacher Education Quarterly, Summer 2008. Introducing Teacher Identity and This Volume.

Rutherford, A. & Kerr, B. (2008). An Inclusive Approach to Online Learning Environments: Models and Resources. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 9(2), article 2. Retrieved 14.2.2013 fromhttp://tojde.anadolu.edu.tr/tojde30/pdf/article_2.pdf

Schoemaker, P. J. H. How to Create a Positive Learning culture. Last updated June 26, 2012. www.ink.com

Street, B. (1993). Culture is a Verb: anthropological aspects of language and cultural process. In Graddol, D., Thompson, L. & M. Byram, (Eds.) Language and Culture. BAAL and Multicultural Matters, Clevedon, (pp. 23-43).

Teräs, H., Leppisaari, I., Teräs, M. & Herrington, J. (2012). Facilitating the development of multicultural learning communities through authentic e-learning. In Kommers, P., Issa, T. & Isaias, P. (Eds.) Proceedings of IADIS International Conference on International Higher Education (IHE 2012) (pp. 29-36)

Tylor, Edward B., 1924 [orig. 1871] Primitive Culture. 2 vols. 7th ed., Brentano's, New York.

Walton & Vykovic. 2003. In Rutherford, A. & Kerr, B. (2008). An Inclusive Approach to Online Learning Environments: Models and Resources. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 9(2), article 2. Retrieved 14.2.2013 from http://tojde.anadolu.edu.tr/tojde30/pdf/article_2.pdf